Forum:Consolidating stubs?

I think it might not be a bad idea to try consolidating some of the stubs that there isn't currently a lot of info for (like say, one or two sentences). An example is the Ai-Naidari caste stuff. I went ahead and created the pages for the individual castes, where any simple blurbs and Notables can be added for each rank. It seems that should be sufficient for most of them with the info currently available, and we can always branch out to more complete stubs/pages with "Main Article" or "Related Topic" links when there is sufficient info to warrant it. (I don't mean to step on any toes! -_- It just seems info can get spread pretty thin with so many one- or two-sentence stubs, and may negate some ease of use.) Tabard (talk) 21:38, February 27, 2012 (UTC)


 * I think it may depend on whether there's more info coming. I have a tendency to build in three phases: rapid-stub-building, make-sense-out-of-the-mess/finesse, and then edit into the best format. Where we know there isn't more info, it makes better sense to consolidate.
 * I'm dumping right now, instead of fleshing, so there will be a bunch of floating stubs that may get renamed to a broader scope and fleshed later if I picked the topic title wrong the first time. Lianamir 21:47, February 27, 2012 (UTC)


 * Ah, okay! I tend to hyper-focus when I'm working on stuff like this (otherwise my attention gets split too many ways and I don't finish *any*thing :p), so I'm used to fleshing out then branching out to related subjects.
 * Oy, I feel like I'm so behind. -_- I haven't had a lot of time to keep up with all the new stuff the last couple weeks. Tabard (talk) 18:31, February 29, 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm playing catch-up too. My head's ahead of my clicketing fingers! Time. If only I could buy a lot more than I've got. Lianamir 18:39, February 29, 2012 (UTC)


 * I wonder if I can entice more people to come play. Hmm. -_- Mcahogarth 19:31, February 29, 2012 (UTC)